Warrick & Boyn, LLP, Elkhart, Indiana

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • Firm Profile
  • Areas of Practice
  • Attorneys
    • Gary D. Boyn
    • Cynthia S. Gillard
    • Randall G. Hesser
    • Ashli L. Hunsberger
    • Dean E. Leazenby
    • Christopher Pottratz
    • Jamie Richardson
    • Timothy S. Shelly
    • Rachel A. Schnetzler
    • Thomas E. Warrick
    • James V. Woodsmall
  • Blog & News
  • Contact

Did you know? Hartman v. BigInch Fabricators

May 14, 2021
Warrick & Boyn, LLP - Elkhart, IndianaRecently, the Indiana Supreme Court handed down an important decision in  Hartman v. BigInch Fabricators & Construction Holding Co., Inc. The Court held that when parties enter into a buy-sell agreement, courts will follow the plain language and ordinary meaning of the agreement unless it is ambiguous. The Court also upheld a neutral arbitrator’s decision to discount a minority shareholder’s interest in a closely held corporation to account for the lack of marketability of the interest in the arbitrator’s determination of fair market value.

This decision affirms long-standing Indiana contract law that courts defer to parties’ contracts unless the language is unclear, ambiguous, or absurd. Here are a few takeaways from the case to keep in mind:

Indiana Courts Firmly Defend Freedom to Contract

Indiana allows parties to control their own fate. This case reiterated the strong desire of the Indiana Courts to follow the terms of an agreement and adheres strictly to the terms in the parties’ agreement. The Supreme Court allowed for minority and marketability discounts to apply to a closely held corporation because of the terms of the buy-sell agreement. In contrast, in Wenzel v. Hopper & Galliher, P.C., 779 N.E.2d 30 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002), the parties did not have a buy-sell agreement, but the Indiana Professional Corporations Act allowed for a compulsory buyback of a shareholder’s interest. The Court found as a matter of public policy that minority and marketability discounts do not apply when determining the market value of shares of a closely held corporation under the Act.

Well Defined Terms

Always ensure that the terms of a buy-sell agreement are clear and unambiguous. When terms of an agreement are well-defined, litigation can often be avoided. In this case, the Courts resolved the parties’ disagreement, but the case went through three levels of the court system to get that finality, costing the parties time and money.

Method, Process, and Formula

The method, process, and formula for determining value needs to be clear. Clarity means litigation is less likely and disputes can be resolved in a timely manner. In this case, the Court had to define appraised market value and determined that the parties followed the terms of the agreement. The Court also noted that the complaining shareholder could have exercised a right to obtain an additional third-party valuation but chose not to, which demonstrates that a party should utilize the process defined by the agreement prior to filing suit.

Buy-sell agreements are critical to any business with more than one interest holder.  Putting off creating these agreements often means surrendering a business’s fate to the determination of the Courts. Warrick & Boyn, LLP, has significant experience drafting, negotiating, and litigating buy-sell agreements. We can review what you currently have in place and help you redefine or upgrade your terms as needed. Contact us today.

Post navigation

← Warrick & Boyn, LLP, welcomes Dean Leazenby back to the firm! Did you know? Equal Employment Opportunity Commission →

Recent News

  • FLSA Misclassification Can Be Very Costly
  • Corporate Transparency Act Reporting: Off Again (For Now)
  • The FMLA Can Apply to Adult Siblings
  • Company Owned Life Insurance

Warrick & Boyn, LLP

861 Parkway Avenue
Elkhart, Indiana 46516
P • (574) 294-7491
F • (574) 294-7284

Warrick & Boyn, LLP

1 day ago

Warrick & Boyn, LLP
It was a great day out for the team recently when we attended the Elkhart City Bar Association's Law Day. Warrick & Boyn attorney, Rachel Schne ... See MoreSee Less
View on Facebook
· Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linked In Share by Email

Warrick & Boyn, LLP

3 days ago

Warrick & Boyn, LLP
Nothing beats getting out and connecting with the businesses and organizations that make Michiana so special! Our attorneys, Chris Pottratz, Rachel ... See MoreSee Less
View on Facebook
· Share

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linked In Share by Email

© 2025 • Warrick & Boyn, LLP

The Warrick & Boyn, LLP website is intended as a general information resource. Any information available on this website is not intended to be legal advice. Warrick & Boyn, LLP is not responsible for any damages or injuries resulting from your use of this website. These include (but are not limited to) damages or injuries caused by any: use or inability to use this site; use or inability to use any site to which you access from this site; interruption of service; defect; delay in operation or transmission; computer virus; malicious code; line failure; or point of access failure. Any information transmitted to this site or to any attorney at this site will not necessarily be held in confidence and may be intercepted by a third party.